Flamur Bucpapaj: THE INDEPENDENCE OF ALBANIA, THE TERRITORIAL PARTITION AND THE GEOSTRATEGIC REASONS (1878–1913)

 

Contents:

Historical Introduction

The Condition of the Ottoman Empire and the Political Vacuum in the Balkans

Geostrategic Reasons for the Partition of Albanian Territories

The Congress of Berlin 1878 – The Beginning of the Territorial Tragedy

The League of Prizren – The Albanian Response and the Concept of Self-Governance

European Diplomacy and the Anti-Albanian Project

The Independence of Albania in 1912 – The Real Circumstances

The Role of Austria-Hungary in the Formation of the Albanian State

The Role of the Ottoman Empire – Support, Hesitation, Betrayal?

The Occupation of 60% of Albanian Territory by Greece, Serbia and Montenegro

The Conference of Ambassadors 1913 – The Fatal Intervention

Albania Left “Without Its Main Cities” – The Economic Dimension

Demographic, Cultural and Military Consequences

Long-Term Consequences for the Albanian State

 

 

HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION

 

The Albanians entered the 20th century as one of the oldest peoples of Europe, yet without a state, without their own administration, and left at the mercy of the expansionist politics of their neighbors. After more than 400 years of Ottoman rule, the Empire began to collapse rapidly. All Balkan nations saw this as an opportunity to expand at the expense of Albanian lands.

The reasons why Albanians were left without a complete state are multidimensional:

the strategy of the Great Powers to create “buffer states”

the religious and civilizational interests of Russia and France

Europe’s fear of the creation of a large Albania

the lack of a centralized Albanian elite

This study analyzes why Albania was declared independent but left truncated, within borders designed to guarantee permanent weakness.

 

THE CONDITION OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE

 

“The Sick Man of the Bosphorus”

 

By 1820, the Ottoman Empire was the weakest power in Europe. Its decline produced:

 

a political vacuum rivalry between Russia, Austria-Hungary, Britain and France

 

a race for control of the Adriatic and the Aegean

Albanians found themselves at the center of this vacuum.

The Tanzimat Reforms and Their Anti-Albanian Effects

The Tanzimat brought harsh centralization, the elimination of local autonomies, and blows against the Albanian feudal elites. Albanians felt more threatened by Istanbul than by the Serbs or Greeks – a hisorical paradox.

The Economic Role of Albanian Regions in the Empire

Albania (the Vilayets of Shkodër, Kosovo, Manastir, and Janina):

provided the main maritime corridors

was the gateway to the Adriatic

hosted economically dynamic cities

Therefore, every foreign power sought control over these lands.

 

THE GEOSTRATEGIC REASONS FOR THE PARTITION

 

This section is expanded and represents one of the most important chapters of the study.

Maritime Reasons

Whoever controlled the Albanian coastline controlled:

the entrance to the Adriatic

trade routes to Central Europe

the maritime axis Otranto–Corfu

This is why Greece claimed the South, Serbia wanted access to the sea, and Montenegro sought Shkodër.

Land-Based Reasons

Albania represented the connecting link between Western Balkans and the East. Whoever controlled it, controlled:

the Nish–Prishtina–Shkodër corridor

the salt and trade routes

the main ports (Durrës, Vlora, Shkodër)

 

 

Distorted Ethnic Arguments

Neighboring states used false ethnic arguments:

the Greeks claimed that “Epirus was Greek”

the Serbs invented “Old Serbia”

the Montenegrins invented “free Slavic lands”

These propaganda efforts were supported by the Orthodox Church and Russia.

The Interests of the Great Powers

Russia – pro-Serbia and pro-Greece

France – pro-Greek

Britain – aimed to stop Russia

Austria-Hungary – supported Albanians as a barrier against Serbia

Thus, the 1913 decision was political, not ethnic or geographic.

 

 

 

THE CONGRESS OF BERLIN 1878 – THE BEGINNING OF THE TRAGEDY

 

The Congress excluded from the future Albanian state:

 

Plav–Gusinje, Ulcinj, Hot–Grudë, Tivar–Podgorica

 

Albanians protested, but no one listened.

Reason: Albanians were not recognized as a “nation,” because they had no state and no diplomatic representation.

 

THE LEAGUE OF PRIZREN

 

Its position was clear:

 

the protection of the territorial integrity of the Albanian vilayets

the prevention of partition by neighbors

the foundation of the Albanian political identity

The League created a real army, built diplomacy, and for the first time proposed Albania as a political entity.

 

 

EUROPEAN DIPLOMACY – THE ANTI-ALBANIAN PROJECT

 

Albania was perceived as:

a Muslim land, therefore “not part of Europe”

too large to be left uncontrolled

a risk that would create minority issues in the Balkans

Therefore the chosen model was:

a small, dependent, economically weak Albania.

 

 

THE INDEPENDENCE OF 1912: THE REAL CIRCUMSTANCES

 

Ismail Qemali did not seek protection from Europe because:

 

Serbia had just occupied Kosovo

 

Montenegro had surrounded Shkodër

 

Greece had occupied Janina, Himara, and Gjirokastër

 

 

The declaration was an act of rescue, not triumph

 

THE ROLE OF AUSTRIA–HUNGARY

Crucial for Albania’s survival:

prevented Greece from proclaiming sovereignty over Vlora

recognized the independence of the Albanian state

stopped Serbia from reaching the Adriatic

 

 

STUDY: THE INDEPENDENCE OF ALBANIA, THE TERRITORIAL PARTITION AND THE GEOSTRATEGIC REASONS (1878–1913)

 

Flamur Buçpapaj

 

Contents

 

Historical Introduction

 

The Condition of the Ottoman Empire and the Political Vacuum in the Balkans

 

Geostrategic Reasons for the Partition of Albanian Territories

 

The Congress of Berlin 1878 – The Beginning of the Territorial Tragedy

 

The League of Prizren – The Albanian Response and the Concept of Self-Governance

 

European Diplomacy and the Anti-Albanian Project

 

The Independence of Albania in 1912 – The Real Circumstances

 

The Role of Austria-Hungary in the Formation of the Albanian State

 

The Role of the Ottoman Empire – Support, Hesitation, Betrayal?

 

The Occupation of 60% of Albanian Territory by Greece, Serbia and Montenegro

 

The Conference of Ambassadors 1913 – The Fatal Intervention

 

Albania Left “Without Its Main Cities” – The Economic Dimension

 

Demographic, Cultural and Military Consequences

 

Long-Term Consequences for the Albanian State

 

HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION

 

The Albanians entered the 20th century as one of the oldest peoples of Europe, yet without a state, without their own administration, and left at the mercy of the expansionist politics of their neighbors. After more than 400 years of Ottoman rule, the Empire began to collapse rapidly. All Balkan nations saw this as an opportunity to expand at the expense of Albanian lands.

 

The reasons why Albanians were left without a complete state are multidimensional:

 

the strategy of the Great Powers to create “buffer states”

 

the religious and civilizational interests of Russia and France

 

Europe’s fear of the creation of a large Albania

 

the lack of a centralized Albanian elite

 

This study analyzes why Albania was declared independent but left truncated, within borders designed to guarantee permanent weakness.

 

THE CONDITION OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE

 

“The Sick Man of the Bosphorus”

 

By 1820, the Ottoman Empire was the weakest power in Europe. Its decline produced:

 

a political vacuum

 

rivalry between Russia, Austria-Hungary, Britain and France

 

a race for control of the Adriatic and the Aegean

 

 

Albanians found themselves at the center of this vacuum.

 

The Tanzimat Reforms and Their Anti-Albanian Effects

 

The Tanzimat brought harsh centralization, the elimination of local autonomies, and blows against the Albanian feudal elites. Albanians felt more threatened by Istanbul than by the Serbs or Greeks – a historical paradox.

 

The Economic Role of Albanian Regions in the Empire

 

Albania (the Vilayets of Shkodër, Kosovo, Manastir, and Janina):

 

provided the main maritime corridors

 

was the gateway to the Adriatic

 

hosted economically dynamic cities

 

 

Therefore, every foreign power sought control over these lands.

 

THE GEOSTRATEGIC REASONS FOR THE PARTITION

 

This section is expanded and represents one of the most important chapters of the study.

 

Maritime Reasons

 

Whoever controlled the Albanian coastline controlled:

 

the entrance to the Adriatic

 

trade routes to Central Europe

 

the maritime axis Otranto–Corfu

 

 

This is why Greece claimed the South, Serbia wanted access to the sea, and Montenegro sought Shkodër.

 

Land-Based Reasons

 

Albania represented the connecting link between Western Balkans and the East. Whoever controlled it, controlled:

 

the Nish–Prishtina–Shkodër corridor

 

the salt and trade routes

 

the main ports (Durrës, Vlora, Shkodër)

 

 

Distorted Ethnic Arguments

 

Neighboring states used false ethnic arguments:

 

the Greeks claimed that “Epirus was Greek”

 

the Serbs invented “Old Serbia”

 

the Montenegrins invented “free Slavic lands”

 

 

These propaganda efforts were supported by the Orthodox Church and Russia.

 

The Interests of the Great Powers

 

Russia – pro-Serbia and pro-Greece

 

France – pro-Greek

 

Britain – aimed to stop Russia

 

Austria-Hungary – supported Albanians as a barrier against Serbia

 

Thus, the 1913 decision was political, not ethnic or geographic.

 

THE CONGRESS OF BERLIN 1878 – THE BEGINNING OF THE TRAGEDY

 

The Congress excluded from the future Albanian state:

 

Plav–Gusinje

 

Ulcinj

 

Hot–Grudë

 

Tivar–Podgorica

 

 

Albanians protested, but no one listened.

 

Reason: Albanians were not recognized as a “nation,” because they had no state and no diplomatic representation.

 

THE LEAGUE OF PRIZREN

 

Its position was clear:

 

the protection of the territorial integrity of the Albanian vilayets

 

the prevention of partition by neighbors

 

the foundation of the Albanian political identity

 

The League created a real army, built diplomacy, and for the first time proposed Albania as a political entity.

 

EUROPEAN DIPLOMACY – THE ANTI-ALBANIAN PROJECT

 

Albania was perceived as:

 

a Muslim land, therefore “not part of Europe”

 

too large to be left uncontrolled

 

a risk that would create minority issues in the Balkans

 

 

Therefore the chosen model was:

a small, dependent, economically weak Albania.

 

THE INDEPENDENCE OF 1912: THE REAL CIRCUMSTANCES

 

Ismail Qemali did not seek protection from Europe because:

 

Serbia had just occupied Kosovo

 

Montenegro had surrounded Shkodër

 

Greece had occupied Janina, Himara, and Gjirokastër

 

The declaration was an act of rescue, not triumph.

 

 

THE ROLE OF AUSTRIA–HUNGARY

 

Crucial for Albania’s survival:

 

prevented Greece from proclaiming sovereignty over Vlora

 

recognized the independence of the Albanian state

 

stopped Serbia from reaching the Adriatic

 

proposed Prince Wied as monarch

 

 

Without Austria–Hungary, Albania would not have existed in any form.

 

THE ROLE OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE

 

The Empire:

 

did not want to lose territories

 

but could no longer protect Albanians

 

tried to send administrators to persuade Albanians against independence

 

withdrew once it saw that the European powers had already decided on partition

 

Albanians understood that the Porte was no longer a protector.

 

THE OCCUPATION OF 60% OF ALBANIAN TERRITORY BY GREECE AND SERBIA

 

Serbia occupied:

 

all of Kosovo

 

Skopje

 

Tetovo

 

Kumanovo

 

Presheva

 

Medvegja

 

 

Greece occupied:

 

Janina

 

Gjirokastër

 

Himara

 

Çamëria

 

Korça (temporarily)

 

Vlora (briefly)

 

 

These were the economic hearts of Albanian regions.

 

THE CONFERENCE OF AMBASSADORS 1913 – THE FINALIZATION OF THE PARTITION

 

Key decisions:

 

borders would not follow ethnicity

 

they would follow the interests of the powers

 

Albania was left with the minimal territory for survival

 

Kosovo was given to Serbia as “war compensation”

 

Çamëria was given to Greece as “regional balance”

 

This was a deliberately engineered injustice.

 

ALBANIA WITHOUT ITS MAIN CITIES

 

Outside Albania remained:

 

Janina – the economic center

 

Skopje – the Albanian metropolis

 

Prizren – the cultural center

 

Peja – the trade hub

 

Ulcinj – strategic port

 

Tivar – Adriatic link

 

Mitrovica – mining region

 

 

This weakened the Albanian economy for 100 years.

 

CONSEQUENCES

 

structural poverty

 

lack of markets

 

isolation

 

damage to cultural identity

 

massive emigration

 

internal political turmo

 

CONSEQUENCES FROM 1913 UNTIL TODAY

 

economically non-functional borders

 

lack of major urban centers

 

constant pressure from neighbors

 

weaknesses in state-building

 

delayed industrial development

 

a state forced to survive, not develop

 

NEW SCHOLARLY IDEAS (NEVER USED BEFORE)

 

These viewpoints are new analyses rarely treated by classical scholars:

 

Albania was created as a state designed to fail economically

 

If a state lacks:

 

large cities

 

advanced ports

 

mines

 

trade routes

It remains dependent.

 

The borders were drawn to block Albanian national unification for 100 years

 

Every major Albanian city was deliberately separated by a border line.

 

The concept of the “unfinished Albania”

 

The Albanian state of 1913 was not the product of Albanians, but of diplomats. Real Albania is much larger than the formal borders.

 

Albanians were treated as a dangerous factor because they were the largest population in the Balkans after the Slavs

 

The actual number of Albanians was far greater than acknowledged by European reports.

 

Conclusion

 

The independence of Albania was not a gift but an act of salvation. However, it was accompanied by severe partition and imposed poverty.

 

Had Albania included its historical Albanian territories, today it would have been a country with:

 

more than 10 million inhabitants

 

the most powerful ports of the Adriatic

 

giant mining industries

 

university centers in Skopje, Prizren, Janina

 

 

But European conferences decided to create a weak state that would not compete with Serbia or others.

 

Nëse dëshironi, mund t’jua formatoj këtë si PDF, Word, ose version 50-faqesh të zgjeruar.ve existed in any

 

THE ROLE OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE

 

The Empire:

 

did not want to lose territories

 

but could no longer protect Albanians

 

tried to send administrators to persuade Albanians against independence

 

withdrew once it saw that the European powers had already decided on partition

 

Albanians understood that the Porte was no longer a protector.

 

THE OCCUPATION OF 60% OF ALBANIAN TERRITORY BY GREECE AND SERBIA

 

Serbia occupied:

 

all of Kosovo

 

Skopje

 

Tetovo

 

Kumanovo

 

Presheva

 

Medvegja

 

 

Greece occupied:

 

Janina

 

Gjirokastër

 

Himara

 

Çamëria

 

Korça (temporarily)

 

Vlora

 

THE CONFERENCE OF AMBASSADORS 1913 – THE FINALIZATION OF THE PARTITION

 

Key decisions:

 

borders would not follow ethnicity

 

they would follow the interests of the powers

 

Albania was left with the minimal territory for survival

 

Kosovo was given to Serbia as “war compensation”

 

Çamëria was given to Greece as “regional balance”

 

This was a deliberately engineered injustice.

 

ALBANIA WITHOUT ITS MAIN CITIES

 

Outside Albania remained:

 

Janina – the economic center

 

Skopje – the Albanian metropolis

 

Prizren – the cultural center

 

Peja – the trade hub

 

Ulcinj – strategic port

 

Tivar – Adriatic link

 

Mitrovica – mining region

 

This weakened the Albanian economy for 100 years.

 

CONSEQUENCES

 

structural poverty

 

lack of markets

 

isolation

 

damage to cultural identity

 

massive emigration

 

internal political turmoil

 

CONSEQUENCES FROM 1913 UNTIL TODAY

 

economically non-functional borders

 

lack of major urban centers

 

constant pressure from neighbors

 

weaknesses in state-building

 

delayed industrial development

 

a state forced to survive, not develop

 

 

NEW SCHOLARLY IDEAS (NEVER USED BEFORE)

 

These viewpoints are new analyses rarely treated by classical scholars:

 

Albania was created as a state designed to fail economically

 

If a state lacks:

 

large cities

 

advanced ports

 

mines

 

trade routes

 

 

It remains dependent.

 

The borders were drawn to block Albanian national unification for 100 years

 

Every major Albanian city was deliberately separated by a border line.

 

The concept of the “unfinished Albania”

 

The Albanian state of 1913 was not the product of Albanians, but of diplomats. Real Albania is much larger than the formal borders.

 

Albanians were treated as a dangerous factor because they were the largest population in the Balkans after the Slavs

 

The actual number of Albanians was far greater than acknowledged by European reports.

 

Conclusion

 

The independence of Albania was not a gift but an act of salvation. However, it was accompanied by severe partition and imposed poverty.

 

Had Albania included its historical Albanian territories, today it would have been a country with:

 

more than 10 million inhabitants

 

the most powerful ports of the Adriatic

 

giant mining industries

 

university centers in Skopje, Prizren, Janina

 

But European conferences decided to create a weak state that would not compete with Serbia or others.

[11:29, 11/27/2025] Mujë Buçpapaj: Ok